By Jim Sweeney
Senior VP of Sales & Marketing
ClearCount Medical Solutions
published on Becker's ASC Review
Retained surgical sponges are one of the oldest surgical
complications documented in clinical literature and remain today an
enduring risk to operating room facilities, personnel and the public
they serve. Today there is hope that with the addition of new
technology, the incidence of retained sponges can be dramatically
reduced or even eliminated. Here are 10 things you should know about
this persistent problem.
1. Retained surgical items (RSIs) are the most frequent and most costly surgical "never event,"
according to data from CMS.[1] In Oct. 2008, Medicare implemented
policy to no longer reimburse hospitals for consequential surgical
procedures and charges associated with this hospital-acquired error.
Most private insurers subsequently followed this reimbursement policy.
2. In 2010, RSIs became the #1 sentinel event reported in the United States among all adverse events
that can lead to patient injury.[2] Sentinel events are defined and
tracked by The Joint Commission, which accredits hospitals as a
condition of licensure and the receipt of Medicaid reimbursement.
3. Surgical sponges represent over two-thirds of all RSIs
due to their prevalence and function in surgery, and are typically
regarded as the most dangerous retained item due to complications of
serious infection and adherence to critical tissue and organ structures.
It is also estimated that each retained surgical sponge incident costs
providers more than $250,000 per incident.[3]
4. According to a New England Journal of Medicine article, approximately
one in every 1,500 chest or abdominal surgeries results in a sponge or
other item being accidentally left inside the patient.[4] Estimates of annual incidence translate to 40-60 cases of retained incidents per week throughout the United States.
5. The underlying cause of RSIs is predominantly due to falsely reconciled sponge counts. In
88 percent of the cases where a retained item is discovered,
retrospective review of the surgical record indicates the surgical staff
believed they had accounted for all items used in the surgical case.[5]
to read the full article please visit Becker's ASC Review
To read about Patient Safety programs and case studies please visit www.psqh.com
No comments:
Post a Comment